-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Message Signature to identify message sender and sending messages back #130
Conversation
811c7d0
to
d6c3d28
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall good, but need a little more work with doctests, examples and overall documentation. Also, we might need to refine the structure of the Signature
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comments will be addressed in dead letters development
9ac8d38
to
6f1e16c
Compare
2e01de5
to
8b61725
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Except for the tuple variant issue, this looks good. We should get rid of tuples at the public API. This will be extremely confusing for a newcomer.
That was worker enumeration discard my comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see any blocker to merge this one.
Thank you for your big contribution 💯 :) |
Resolves #119